Re: [PATCH] staging/imx-drm: fix code line width
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Apr 25 2014 - 19:10:41 EST
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 02:04:21PM +0400, Brilliantov Kirill Vladimirovich wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Brilliantov Kirill Vladimirovich <brilliantov@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-tve.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-di.c | 12 ++++++++----
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipuv3-crtc.c | 6 ++++--
> 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-tve.c b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-tve.c
> index 575533f..7023035 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-tve.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-tve.c
> @@ -669,7 +669,8 @@ static int imx_tve_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>
> ret = regmap_read(tve->regmap, TVE_COM_CONF_REG, &val);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to read configuration register: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "failed to read configuration register: %d\n", ret);
Why not just move the ret variable to the next line?
> return ret;
> }
> if (val != 0x00100000) {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.h b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.h
> index c4d14ea..4fd7be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.h
> @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ struct ipu_ch_param {
> struct ipu_cpmem_word word[2];
> };
>
> -void ipu_ch_param_write_field(struct ipu_ch_param __iomem *base, u32 wbs, u32 v);
> +void ipu_ch_param_write_field(struct ipu_ch_param __iomem *base, u32 wbs,
> + u32 v);
> u32 ipu_ch_param_read_field(struct ipu_ch_param __iomem *base, u32 wbs);
> struct ipu_ch_param __iomem *ipu_get_cpmem(struct ipuv3_channel *channel);
> void ipu_ch_param_dump(struct ipu_ch_param __iomem *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c
> index ca85d3d..b2c672f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c
> @@ -233,14 +233,20 @@ void ipu_cpmem_set_yuv_interleaved(struct ipu_ch_param __iomem *p,
> {
> switch (pixel_format) {
> case V4L2_PIX_FMT_UYVY:
> - ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_BPP, 3); /* bits/pixel */
> - ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_PFS, 0xA); /* pix format */
> - ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_NPB, 31); /* burst size */
> + /* bits/pixel */
> + ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_BPP, 3);
> + /* pix format */
> + ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_PFS, 0xA);
> + /* burst size */
> + ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_NPB, 31);
> break;
> case V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV:
> - ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_BPP, 3); /* bits/pixel */
> - ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_PFS, 0x8); /* pix format */
> - ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_NPB, 31); /* burst size */
> + /* bits/pixel */
> + ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_BPP, 3);
> + /* pix format */
> + ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_PFS, 0x8);
> + /* burst size */
> + ipu_ch_param_write_field(p, IPU_FIELD_NPB, 31);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -900,7 +906,8 @@ static void ipu_irq_handle(struct ipu_soc *ipu, const int *regs, int num_regs)
> status &= ipu_cm_read(ipu, IPU_INT_CTRL(regs[i]));
>
> for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, 32) {
> - irq = irq_linear_revmap(ipu->domain, regs[i] * 32 + bit);
> + irq =
> + irq_linear_revmap(ipu->domain, regs[i] * 32 + bit);
Does that really look better?
> if (irq)
> generic_handle_irq(irq);
> }
> @@ -1053,7 +1060,7 @@ static int ipu_irq_init(struct ipu_soc *ipu)
> }
>
> ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(ipu->domain, 32, 1, "IPU",
> - handle_level_irq, 0, IRQF_VALID, 0);
> + handle_level_irq, 0, IRQF_VALID, 0);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(ipu->dev, "failed to alloc generic irq chips\n");
> irq_domain_remove(ipu->domain);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c
> index d5de8bb..b05111a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c
> @@ -132,10 +132,12 @@ static void dc_write_tmpl(struct ipu_dc *dc, int word, u32 opcode, u32 operand,
> reg1 = (operand << 20) & 0xfff00000;
> reg2 = operand >> 12 | opcode << 1 | stop << 9;
> } else if (opcode == WRG) {
> - reg1 = sync | glue << 4 | ++wave << 11 | ((operand << 15) & 0xffff8000);
> + reg1 = sync | glue << 4 | ++wave << 11 |
> + ((operand << 15) & 0xffff8000);
> reg2 = operand >> 17 | opcode << 7 | stop << 9;
> } else {
> - reg1 = sync | glue << 4 | ++wave << 11 | ++map << 15 | ((operand << 20) & 0xfff00000);
> + reg1 = sync | glue << 4 | ++wave << 11 | ++map << 15 |
> + ((operand << 20) & 0xfff00000);
> reg2 = operand >> 12 | opcode << 4 | stop << 9;
> }
> writel(reg1, priv->dc_tmpl_reg + word * 8);
> @@ -188,19 +190,25 @@ int ipu_dc_init_sync(struct ipu_dc *dc, struct ipu_di *di, bool interlaced,
> dc_link_event(dc, DC_EVT_EOL, 3, 2);
> dc_link_event(dc, DC_EVT_NEW_DATA, 1, 1);
> /* Init template microcode */
> - dc_write_tmpl(dc, 2, WROD(0), 0, map, SYNC_WAVE, 8, 5, 1);
> - dc_write_tmpl(dc, 3, WROD(0), 0, map, SYNC_WAVE, 4, 5, 0);
> + dc_write_tmpl(dc, 2, WROD(0), 0, map, SYNC_WAVE, 8,
> + 5, 1);
> + dc_write_tmpl(dc, 3, WROD(0), 0, map, SYNC_WAVE, 4,
> + 5, 0);
> dc_write_tmpl(dc, 4, WRG, 0, map, NULL_WAVE, 0, 0, 1);
> - dc_write_tmpl(dc, 1, WROD(0), 0, map, SYNC_WAVE, 0, 5, 1);
> + dc_write_tmpl(dc, 1, WROD(0), 0, map, SYNC_WAVE, 0,
> + 5, 1);
Just leave these alone, if it doesn't look better, it's not worth
changing.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/