Re: [PATCH] ftrace/arm: add save_stack_trace_regs() implementation

From: ivan lin
Date: Sun Apr 27 2014 - 00:15:12 EST


2014-04-23 21:03 GMT+08:00 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:21 +0800
> Lin Yongting <linyongting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> When configure kprobe events of ftrace with "stacktrace" option enabled
>> in arm, there is no stacktrace was recorded after the kprobe event was
>> triggered. The root cause is no save_stack_trace_regs() function implemented.
>>
>> Implement the save_stack_trace_regs() function in arm, then ftrace will
>> call this architecture-related function to record the stacktrace into
>> ring buffer.
>>
>> After this fix, stacktrace can be recorded, for example:
>>
>> # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug
>> # echo "p:netrx net_rx_action" >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
>> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/netrx/enable
>> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace
>> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
>> # ping 127.0.0.1 -c 1
>> # echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
>>
>> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
>> # tracer: nop
>> #
>> # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 12/12 #P:1
>> #
>> # _-----=> irqs-off
>> # / _----=> need-resched
>> # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
>> # || / _--=> preempt-depth
>> # ||| / delay
>> # TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
>> # | | | |||| | |
>> <------ missing some entries ---------------->
>> ping-1200 [000] dNs1 667.603250: netrx: (net_rx_action+0x0/0x1f8)
>> ping-1200 [000] dNs1 667.604738: <stack trace>
>> => net_rx_action
>> => do_softirq
>> => local_bh_enable
>> => ip_finish_output
>> => ip_output
>> => ip_local_out
>> => ip_send_skb
>> => ip_push_pending_frames
>> => raw_sendmsg
>> => inet_sendmsg
>> => sock_sendmsg
>> => SyS_sendto
>> => ret_fast_syscall
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lin Yongting <linyongting@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> As this affects ftrace for ARM...
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> -- Steve
>

Hi Russell

How about my Patch? any advice is appreciateã

Best Regards!

-- Yongting.


>> arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> index af4e8c8..c558db6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,25 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
>> trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
>> }
>>
>> +void save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
>> +{
>> + struct stack_trace_data data;
>> + struct stackframe frame;
>> +
>> + data.trace = trace;
>> + data.skip = trace->skip;
>> + data.no_sched_functions = 0;
>> +
>> + frame.fp = regs->ARM_fp;
>> + frame.sp = regs->ARM_sp;
>> + frame.lr = regs->ARM_lr;
>> + frame.pc = regs->ARM_pc;
>> +
>> + walk_stackframe(&frame, save_trace, &data);
>> + if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
>> + trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
>> +}
>> +
>> void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
>> {
>> save_stack_trace_tsk(current, trace);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/