Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] perf record: Propagate exit status of a command line workload

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Tue Apr 29 2014 - 06:57:32 EST


On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:27:33PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index eb524f91bffe..b1523d8a6191 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -152,26 +152,6 @@ static void sig_handler(int sig)
> signr = sig;

looks like there's no use for 'signr' now.. could be removed

> }
>
> -static void record__sig_exit(int exit_status __maybe_unused, void *arg)
> -{
> - struct record *rec = arg;
> - int status;
> -
> - if (rec->evlist->workload.pid > 0) {
> - if (!child_finished)
> - kill(rec->evlist->workload.pid, SIGTERM);
> -
> - wait(&status);
> - if (WIFSIGNALED(status))
> - psignal(WTERMSIG(status), rec->progname);
> - }
> -
> - if (signr == -1 || signr == SIGUSR1)
> - return;
> -
> - signal(signr, SIG_DFL);

I was wondering what was this one for and found:

perf_counter tools: Propagate signals properly
commit f7b7c26e01e51fe46097e11f179dc71ce7950084
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jun 10 15:55:59 2009 +0200

but I dont think we need to do that

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/