Re: [PATCH V2 00/36] timers/hrtimers: Cleanups & Fixes

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Apr 30 2014 - 04:52:11 EST


On 4 April 2014 12:05, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know you are not going to look at these before end of this merge window and
> you wanted to have a look at V1 before me posting these. But I am reposting them
> now due to these reasons:
> - Need to resend my cpu isolation (cpuset.quiesce) patches which are based of
> these
> - Few patches are dropped/merged/fixed/updated and so all the patches from V1
> wouldn't have made sense
> - There were some new patches as well which I wanted to send
>
> These have gone through fair bit of testing via kbuild system maintained by
> Fengguang Wu.
>
>
> These are some minor cleanups and potential bug fixes in there. These are based
> of tip/timers-core-for-linus ..
>
> V1 of most of these patches (~28) were posted here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/26/107
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/28/148
>
> V1->V2:
> - few new patches:
> - patches around for_each_active_base()
> - hrtimer: call switch_hrtimer_base() after setting new expiry time
> - Some other minor cleanups
> - few patches are dropped
> - few are merged together as they covered same stuff
> - rebased all patches and moved the patches removing parameters or return values
> at the bottom, so that others can be applied easily. Though as per my last
> mail, it doesn't look like they are making the 'text' segments any bigger.

Any inputs on these ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/