Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: Fix lockless tty buffer race

From: Peter Hurley
Date: Fri May 02 2014 - 11:05:49 EST


On 05/02/2014 10:56 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
Commit 6a20dbd6caa2358716136144bf524331d70b1e03,
"tty: Fix race condition between __tty_buffer_request_room and flush_to_ldisc"
correctly identifies an unsafe race condition between
__tty_buffer_request_room() and flush_to_ldisc(), where the consumer
flush_to_ldisc() prematurely advances the head before consuming the
last of the data committed. For example:

CPU 0 | CPU 1
__tty_buffer_request_room | flush_to_ldisc
... | ...
| count = head->commit - head->read
n = tty_buffer_alloc() |
b->commit = b->used |
b->next = n |
| if (!count) /* T */
| if (head->next == NULL) /* F */
| buf->head = head->next

In this case, buf->head has been advanced but head->commit may have
been updated with a new value.

Instead of reintroducing an unnecessary lock, fix the race locklessly.
Read the commit-next pair in the reverse order of writing, which guarantees
the commit value read is the latest value written if the head is
advancing.

Reported-by: Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@xxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.12.x+

The patch submitted by Manfred notes the commits which introduced the
race [1], but attributes those commits to the 3.11 cycle. Those commits
were merged in the 3.12 cycle.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

[1] commits e8437d7ecbc50198705331449367d401ebb3181f,
"tty: Make driver-side flip buffers lockless", and
e9975fdec0138f1b2a85b9624e41660abd9865d4,
"tty: Ensure single-threaded flip buffer consumer with mutex"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/