Re: [tip:timers/nohz] nohz: Move full nohz kick to its own IPI

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon May 05 2014 - 10:58:26 EST


On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Should we instead do irq_work_queue_on() ?
>
> I would really much prefer that yeah. But if we do that, expect some added overhead on the local
> irq_work_queue() path though. irq_work_raise can't use local cmpxchg ops anymore.
>
> Or we can have a different pending raise system for remote irq work.
>
> I can try something.

Loosing that local cmpxchg shouldn't be a problem, I don't thnk this is
a particularly hot path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/