Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] fanotify: check file flags passed in fanotify_init

From: Heinrich Schuchardt
Date: Wed May 14 2014 - 17:28:40 EST


Hello Andrew,

the patch below has been reviewed by Jan Kara.

It integrates feedback given by Michael Kerrisk concerning which flags should be allowable.

Please, consider it for inclusion into the mm tree.

Best regards

Heinrich Schuchardt

On 14.05.2014 23:17, Jan Kara wrote:
On Mon 12-05-14 21:02:16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Without this patch fanotify_init does not validate the value passed in
event_f_flags.

When a fanotify event is read from the fanotify file descriptor a new file
descriptor is created where file.f_flags = event_f_flags.

Internal and external open flags are stored together in field f_flags of
struct file. Hence, an application might create file descriptors with
internal flags like FMODE_EXEC, FMODE_NOCMTIME set.

Jan Kara and Eric Paris both aggreed that this is a bug and the value of
event_f_flags should be checked:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/522
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/539

This updated patch version considers the comments by Michael Kerrisk in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/4/10

With the patch the value of event_f_flags is checked.
When specifying an invalid value error EINVAL is returned.

Internal flags are disallowed.

File creation flags are disallowed:
O_CREAT, O_DIRECTORY, O_EXCL, O_NOCTTY, O_NOFOLLOW, O_TRUNC, and O_TTY_INIT.

Flags which do not make sense with fanotify are disallowed:
__O_TMPFILE, O_PATH, FASYNC, and O_DIRECT.

This leaves us with the following allowed values:

O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, O_RDWR are basic functionality. The are stored in the
bits given by O_ACCMODE.

O_APPEND is working as expected. The value might be useful in a logging
application which appends the current status each time the log is opened.

O_LARGEFILE is needed for files exceeding 4GB on 32bit systems.

O_NONBLOCK may be useful when monitoring slow devices like tapes.

O_NDELAY is equal to O_NONBLOCK except for platform parisc.
To avoid code breaking on parisc either both flags should be
allowed or none. The patch allows both.

__O_SYNC and O_DSYNC may be used to avoid data loss on power disruption.

O_NOATIME may be useful to reduce disk activity.

O_CLOEXEC may be useful, if separate processes shall be used to scan files.

Once this patch is accepted, the fanotify_init.2 manpage has to be updated.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx>
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Honza

---
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index d42220f..31b0de2 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@
#define FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_MARKS 8192
#define FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_LISTENERS 128

+/*
+ * All flags that may be specified in parameter event_f_flags of fanotify_init.
+ *
+ * Internal and external open flags are stored together in field f_flags of
+ * struct file. Only external open flags shall be allowed in event_f_flags.
+ * Internal flags like FMODE_NONOTIFY, FMODE_EXEC, FMODE_NOCMTIME shall be
+ * excluded.
+ */
+#define FANOTIFY_INIT_ALL_EVENT_F_BITS ( \
+ O_ACCMODE | O_APPEND | O_NONBLOCK | \
+ __O_SYNC | O_DSYNC | O_CLOEXEC | \
+ O_LARGEFILE | O_NOATIME )
+
extern const struct fsnotify_ops fanotify_fsnotify_ops;

static struct kmem_cache *fanotify_mark_cache __read_mostly;
@@ -669,6 +682,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fanotify_init, unsigned int, flags, unsigned int, event_f_flags)
if (flags & ~FAN_ALL_INIT_FLAGS)
return -EINVAL;

+ if (event_f_flags & ~FANOTIFY_INIT_ALL_EVENT_F_BITS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ switch (event_f_flags & O_ACCMODE) {
+ case O_RDONLY:
+ case O_RDWR:
+ case O_WRONLY:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
user = get_current_user();
if (atomic_read(&user->fanotify_listeners) > FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_LISTENERS) {
free_uid(user);
--
2.0.0.rc0


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/