Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end

[Srivatsa S. Bhat]

On 05/21/2014 06:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 06:02:51 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/05/2014 02:39 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2014 02:23 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> Expanded the comment in the code to briefly mention why ASYNC_NOTIFICATION
>>>>> drivers are left out from the check, as suggested by Gautham R. Shenoy.
>>>>> No code changes in this version.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/283
>>>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/28/469
>>>>
>>>> Seems to work on VIA EPIA with 3.15-rc2 (no other cpufreq fixes):
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great! Thanks a lot for testing this!
>>>
>>> Rafael/Viresh, can you please add Meelis' Tested-by while taking
>>> this patch?
>>
>> Rafael, any thoughts on this patch?
>>
>> It has been Acked by Viresh and tested by Meelis. Hope you'll consider
>> picking up this patch for 3.16.
> 
> It should be in linux-next today AFAICS.
> 

Oops, I did check your tree before asking, but I'm not sure how I missed
this. Now I'm able to see the patch in your bleeding-edge branch. Sorry
for the noise!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/