Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: use kmem_cache instead of aligned stack allocations

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu May 22 2014 - 19:52:22 EST


Hi Cody,

On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:44:25 -0700 Cody P Schafer <cody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> if (ret) {
> if (success_expected)
> pr_err_ratelimited("hcall failed: %d %#x %#x %d => 0x%lx (%ld) detail=0x%x failing ix=%x\n",
> domain, offset, ix, lpar,
> ret, ret,
> - result_buffer.buf.detailed_rc,
> - result_buffer.buf.failing_request_ix);
> - return ret;
> + result_buffer->buf.detailed_rc,
> + result_buffer->buf.failing_request_ix);
> + goto out_hcall;
> }
>
> - *res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer.result);
> + *res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer->result);

not a biggie, but this last bit could be (remove the goto out_hcall and
teh label and then)

} else {
*res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer->result);
}

> +out_hcall:
> + kfree(result_buffer);
> +out_resb:
> + kfree(request_buffer);
> +out_reqb:
> return ret;
> }
>

otherwise looks good to me.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature