[PATCH 7/6 v3] ipc/sem.c: add a printk_once for semctl(GETNCNT/GETZCNT)

From: Manfred Spraul
Date: Mon May 26 2014 - 13:12:48 EST


The actual Linux implementation for semctl(GETNCNT) and semctl(GETZCNT)
always (since 0.99.10) reported a thread as sleeping on all semaphores
that are listed in the semop() call.
The documented behavior (both in the Linux man page and in the Single Unix
Specification) is that a task should be reported on exactly one semaphore:
The semaphore that caused the thread to got to sleep.

This patch adds a pr_info_once() that is triggered if a thread hits
the relevant case.

The code triggers slightly too often, otherwise it would be necessary to
replicate the old code. As there are no known users of GETNCNT or GETZCNT,
this is done to prevent unnecessary bloat.

The task that triggered is reported with name (tsk->comm) and pid.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
ipc/sem.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 71a3caf..a6c292d 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1000,6 +1000,17 @@ static int check_qop(struct sem_array *sma, int semnum, struct sem_queue *q,
{
struct sembuf *sop = q->blocking;

+ /*
+ * Linux always (since 0.99.10) reported a task as sleeping on all
+ * semaphores. This violates SUS, therefore it was changed to the
+ * standard compliant behavior.
+ * Give the administrators a chance to notice that an application
+ * might misbehave because it relies on the Linux behavior.
+ */
+ pr_info_once("semctl(GETNCNT/GETZCNT) is since 3.16 Single Unix Specification compliant.\n"
+ "The task %s (%d) triggered the difference, watch for misbehavior.\n",
+ current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
+
if (sop->sem_num != semnum)
return 0;

--
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/