Re: [PATCH 0/3] Qualcomm Resource Power Manager driver
From: Stanimir Varbanov
Date: Mon Jun 02 2014 - 04:15:46 EST
Thanks for the patches.
> Lately I've been working on rpm, rpm-smd, smem, smd, smsm, smp2p
> patches for mainline.
> It could be argued that smd is a bus and should go in drivers/bus, but
> for the rest I fear that we just created drivers/soc/qcom as another
> dumping ground for things; a "Qualcomm specific drivers/mfd".
Do we have some obstacles to not use a "common mailbox framework" for
this IPC (shared memory) communication. It looks that it fits very well
with our needs for this rpm-regulator and future submitting of smd driver?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/