Re: [PATCH 3.10 47/86] vti: dont allow to add the same tunnel twice

From: Nicolas Dichtel
Date: Mon Jun 02 2014 - 04:43:40 EST


Le 29/05/2014 06:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman a Ãcrit :
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 8d89dcdf80d88007647945a753821a06eb6cc5a5 ]

Before the patch, it was possible to add two times the same tunnel:
ip l a vti1 type vti remote 10.16.0.121 local 10.16.0.249 key 41
ip l a vti2 type vti remote 10.16.0.121 local 10.16.0.249 key 41

It was possible, because ip_tunnel_newlink() calls ip_tunnel_find() with the
argument dev->type, which was set only later (when calling ndo_init handler
in register_netdevice()). Let's set this type in the setup handler, which is
called before newlink handler.

Introduced by commit b9959fd3b0fa ("vti: switch to new ip tunnel code").
Not sure to understand why this patch is backported:
$ git describe --contains b9959fd3b0fa
v3.12-rc1~132^2~479

In fact, the patch does not change anything.


Regards,
Nicolas


CC: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
@@ -579,9 +579,9 @@ static void vti_dev_free(struct net_devi
static void vti_tunnel_setup(struct net_device *dev)
{
dev->netdev_ops = &vti_netdev_ops;
+ dev->type = ARPHRD_TUNNEL;
dev->destructor = vti_dev_free;

- dev->type = ARPHRD_TUNNEL;
dev->hard_header_len = LL_MAX_HEADER + sizeof(struct iphdr);
dev->mtu = ETH_DATA_LEN;
dev->flags = IFF_NOARP;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/