Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Be friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Jun 03 2014 - 04:18:54 EST

On 27 May 2014 02:23, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Looks fine, some nits..

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> -void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
> +void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu,
> + unsigned int sampling_rate)

We don't need to pass a new argument, we can get all the information from
dbs_data alone. Its already done for multiple routines. Let me know if you
find it difficult to figure out..
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at