Re: [PATCH] perf: Differentiate exec() and non-exec() comm events

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Nah, I'll frob it. Thanks!
> 
> FYI, this patch breaks pretty much every non-x86 architecture:
> 
> /home/mingo/tip/fs/exec.c: In function 'setup_new_exec':
> /home/mingo/tip/fs/exec.c:1113: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_event_exec'
> make[2]: *** [fs/exec.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Sorry, it was another patch that broke things:

Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed May 21 17:32:19 2014 +0200

    perf: Fix perf_event_comm() vs. exec() assumption

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/