Re: [PATCH 5/7] lib/random32.c: Make prandom_u32_max efficient for powers of 2

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
Date: Sun Jun 08 2014 - 13:34:31 EST


On Sat, Jun 7, 2014, at 1:28, George Spelvin wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/random.h b/include/linux/random.h
> index 57fbbffd..e1f3ec9a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/random.h
> +++ b/include/linux/random.h
> @@ -47,11 +47,23 @@ void prandom_bytes_state(struct rnd_state *state, void *buf, int nbytes);
> * generator, that is, prandom_u32(). This is useful when requesting a
> * random index of an array containing ep_ro elements, for example.
> *
> + * If ep_ro is a power of 2 known at compile time, a modulo operation
> + * reduces to a simple mask to extract the low order bits. Otherwise,
> + * it uses a multiply and shift, which is faster than a general modulus.
> + *
> * Returns: pseudo-random number in interval [0, ep_ro)
> */
> static inline u32 prandom_u32_max(u32 ep_ro)
> {
> - return (u32)(((u64) prandom_u32() * ep_ro) >> 32);
> + /*
> + * Instead of just __builtin_constant_p(ep_ro), this test is
> + * "is it known at compile time that ep_ro is a power of 2?", and
> + * can in theory handle the case that it's an unknown power of 2.
> + */
> + if (__builtin_constant_p(ep_ro & (ep_ro-1)) && !(ep_ro & (ep_ro-1)))
> + return prandom_u32() & (ep_ro-1);
> + else
> + return (u32)((u64)prandom_u32() * ep_ro >> 32);
> }

Have you checked assembler output if this helps anything at all? Constant propagation in the compiler should be able to figure that out all by itself. The only places I use __builtin_constant_p today are where I also make use of inline assembler.

Please check this as it makes the code more complicated and I doubt it is worth it.

Btw, IIRC there is a function is_power_of_2 somewhere. ;)

Thanks,

Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/