Re: 3.15-rc: regression in suspend

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Jun 09 2014 - 06:23:39 EST


On Mon 2014-06-09 11:25:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > that it worked for a while.
>
> git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about
> the 5th report or so that claims this is the culprit but it's
> something else. The above code is definitely not used in i915 so bogus
> bisect result.

Note I did not do the bisect, I only attempted revert and test.

And did three boots of successful s2ram.. only to find out that it
does not really fix s2ram, I was just lucky :-(.

Unfortunately, this means my s2ram problem will be tricky/impossible
to bisect :-(.

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/