Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm, compaction: report compaction as contended only due to lock contention
From: Vlastimil Babka
Date: Tue Jun 10 2014 - 03:11:17 EST
On 06/10/2014 01:50 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Async compaction aborts when it detects zone lock contention or need_resched()
is true. David Rientjes has reported that in practice, most direct async
compactions for THP allocation abort due to need_resched(). This means that a
second direct compaction is never attempted, which might be OK for a page
fault, but hugepaged is intended to attempt a sync compaction in such case and
in these cases it won't.
This patch replaces "bool contended" in compact_control with an enum that
distinguieshes between aborting due to need_resched() and aborting due to lock
contention. This allows propagating the abort through all compaction functions
as before, but declaring the direct compaction as contended only when lock
contantion has been detected.
As a result, hugepaged will proceed with second sync compaction as intended,
when the preceding async compaction aborted due to need_resched().
s/hugepaged/khugepaged/ on the changelog.
Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/compaction.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
mm/internal.h | 15 +++++++++++----
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index b73b182..d37f4a8 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -185,9 +185,14 @@ static void update_pageblock_skip(struct compact_control *cc,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
-static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
+enum compact_contended should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
- return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
+ if (need_resched())
+ return COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
+ else if (spin_is_contended(lock))
+ return COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
+ else
+ return COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
}
/*
I think eventually we're going to remove the need_resched() heuristic
entirely and so enum compact_contended might be overkill, but do we need
to worry about spin_is_contended(lock) && need_resched() reporting
COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED here instead of COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK?
Hm right, maybe I should reorder the two tests.
@@ -202,7 +207,9 @@ static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
{
- if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
+ enum compact_contended contended = should_release_lock(lock);
+
+ if (contended) {
if (locked) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
locked = false;
@@ -210,7 +217,7 @@ static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
/* async aborts if taking too long or contended */
if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
- cc->contended = true;
+ cc->contended = contended;
return false;
}
@@ -236,7 +243,7 @@ static inline bool compact_should_abort(struct compact_control *cc)
/* async compaction aborts if contended */
if (need_resched()) {
if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
- cc->contended = true;
+ cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
return true;
}
@@ -1095,7 +1102,8 @@ static unsigned long compact_zone_order(struct zone *zone, int order,
VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc.freepages));
VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc.migratepages));
- *contended = cc.contended;
+ /* We only signal lock contention back to the allocator */
+ *contended = cc.contended == COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
return ret;
}
Hmm, since the only thing that matters for cc->contended is
COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK, it may make sense to just leave this as a bool
within struct compact_control instead of passing the actual reason around
when it doesn't matter.
That's what I thought first. But we set cc->contended in
isolate_freepages_block() and then check it in isolate_freepages() and
compaction_alloc() to make sure we don't continue the free scanner once
contention (or need_resched()) is detected. And introducing an enum,
even if temporary measure, seemed simpler than making that checking more
complex. This way it can stay the same once we get rid of need_resched().
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 7f22a11f..4659e8e 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -117,6 +117,13 @@ extern int user_min_free_kbytes;
#if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
+/* Used to signal whether compaction detected need_sched() or lock contention */
+enum compact_contended {
+ COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE = 0, /* no contention detected */
+ COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED, /* need_sched() was true */
+ COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK, /* zone lock or lru_lock was contended */
+};
+
/*
* in mm/compaction.c
*/
@@ -144,10 +151,10 @@ struct compact_control {
int order; /* order a direct compactor needs */
int migratetype; /* MOVABLE, RECLAIMABLE etc */
struct zone *zone;
- bool contended; /* True if a lock was contended, or
- * need_resched() true during async
- * compaction
- */
+ enum compact_contended contended; /* Signal need_sched() or lock
+ * contention detected during
+ * compaction
+ */
};
unsigned long
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/