Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] File Sealing & memfd_create()

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Tue Jun 17 2014 - 13:01:35 EST


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:36 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Can you summarize why holes can't be reliably backed by the zero page?
>>>
>>> To answer this, I will quote Hugh from "PATCH v2 1/3":
>>>
>>>> We do already use the ZERO_PAGE instead of allocating when it's a
>>>> simple read; and on the face of it, we could extend that to mmap
>>>> once the file is sealed. But I am rather afraid to do so - for
>>>> many years there was an mmap /dev/zero case which did that, but
>>>> it was an easily forgotten case which caught us out at least
>>>> once, so I'm reluctant to reintroduce it now for sealing.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I don't expect you to resolve the issue of sealed holes:
>>>> that's very much my territory, to give you support on.
>>>
>>> Holes can be avoided with a simple fallocate(). I don't understand why
>>> I should make SEAL_WRITE do the fallocate for the caller. During the
>>> discussion of memfd_create() I was told to drop the "size" parameter,
>>> because it is redundant. I don't see how this implicit fallocate()
>>> does not fall into the same category?
>>>
>>
>> I'm really confused now.
>>
>> If I SEAL_WRITE a file, and then I mmap it PROT_READ, and then I read
>> it, is that a "simple read"? If so, doesn't that mean that there's no
>> problem?
>
> I assumed Hugh was talking about read(). So no, this is not about
> memory-reads on mmap()ed regions.
>
> Looking at shmem_file_read_iter() I can see a ZERO_PAGE(0) call in
> case shmem_getpage_gfp(SGP_READ) tells us there's a hole. I cannot see
> anything like that in the mmap_region() and shmem_fault() paths.

Would it be easy to fix this just for SEAL_WRITE files? Hugh?

This would make the interface much nicer, IMO.

--Andy

>
> Thanks
> David



--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/