Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib.c: skip --param parameters

From: Christopher Li
Date: Sun Jun 29 2014 - 03:19:18 EST


Hi Andy,

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this is problematic.There are three possible input
> from args:
> 1) "--parm", you need to ++next skip to next arg, which is the value for parm.
> 2) "--parm=x", you don't need to skip to next arg.
> 3) "--parm-with-crap", invalid argument. You don't need to skip next arg.


How about this patch, I modify from your patch.
It fix the problem I mention earlier.

If no objections, I will push the change.

Chris
From d917662d54ba68d0c3b03e994cb1fa66d7b19c30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:11:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in
newer GCC versions.

Without this patch sparse recognizes parameter of the --param option as a file
name which obviously couldn't be found.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib.c b/lib.c
index 844797d..0bc4b2b 100644
--- a/lib.c
+++ b/lib.c
@@ -675,22 +675,42 @@ static char **handle_version(char *arg, char **next)
exit(0);
}

+static char **handle_param(char *arg, char **next)
+{
+ char *value = NULL;
+
+ /* For now just skip any '--param=*' or '--param *' */
+ if (*arg == '\0') {
+ value = *++next;
+ } else if (isspace(*arg) || *arg == '=') {
+ value = ++arg;
+ }
+
+ if (!value)
+ die("missing argument for --param option");
+
+ return next;
+}
+
struct switches {
const char *name;
char **(*fn)(char *, char **);
+ unsigned int prefix:1;
};

static char **handle_long_options(char *arg, char **next)
{
static struct switches cmd[] = {
+ { "param", handle_param, 1 },
{ "version", handle_version },
{ NULL, NULL }
};
struct switches *s = cmd;

while (s->name) {
- if (!strcmp(s->name, arg))
- return s->fn(arg, next);
+ int optlen = strlen(s->name);
+ if (!strncmp(s->name, arg, optlen + !s->prefix))
+ return s->fn(arg + optlen, next);
s++;
}
return next;
--
1.9.3