Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] PCI: designware: refactor MSI code to work with v3.65 dw hardware

From: Jingoo Han
Date: Tue Jul 08 2014 - 08:20:41 EST


On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 1:53 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 12:17 AM, Mohit KUMAR DCG wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 3:15 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> >>
> >> Keystone PCI controller is based on v3.65 version of the DW PCI h/w that
> >> implements MSI controller registers in application space compared to the
> >> newer version. This requires updates to the DW core API to support the PCI
> >> controller driver based on this old DW hardware. Add msi_irq_set()/clear()
> >> API functions to allow Set/Clear MSI IRQ enable bit in the application register.
> >> Also the old h/w uses MSI_IRQ register in application register space to raise
> >> MSI IRQ to the RC from EP. Current code uses the standard mechanism as
> >> per PCI spec. So add another API get_msi_data() to get the address of this
> >> register so that common code can be re-used on old h/w.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@xxxxxx>
> >>
> >> CC: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> >> CC: Russell King<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Grant Likely<grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Rob Herring<robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Mohit Kumar<mohit.kumar@xxxxxx>
> >> CC: Jingoo Han<jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Bjorn Helgaas<bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Pratyush Anand<pratyush.anand@xxxxxx>
> >> CC: Richard Zhu<r65037@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@xxxxxx>
> >> CC: Marek Vasut<marex@xxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Pawel Moll<pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Mark Rutland<mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Ian Campbell<ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Kumar Gala<galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Grant Likely<grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> ---------
> >> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 3 +++
> >> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> >> designware.c
> >> index d8f3af7..905941c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> >> @@ -217,27 +217,47 @@ static int find_valid_pos0(struct pcie_port *pp, int
> >> msgvec, int pos, int *pos0)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) {
> >> + unsigned int res, bit, val;
> >> +
> >> + res = (irq / 32) * 12;
> >> + bit = irq % 32;
> >> + dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,&val);
> >> + val&= ~(1<< bit);
> >> + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val); }
> >> +
> >> static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
> >> unsigned int nvec, unsigned int pos) {
> >> - unsigned int i, res, bit, val;
> >> + unsigned int i;
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i< nvec; i++) {
> >> irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq_base, i, NULL);
> >> clear_bit(pos + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
> >> /* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI controller */
> >> - res = ((pos + i) / 32) * 12;
> >> - bit = (pos + i) % 32;
> >> - dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
> >> 4,&val);
> >> - val&= ~(1<< bit);
> >> - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
> >> 4, val);
> >> + if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq)
> >> + pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, pos + i);
> >> + else
> >> + dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(pp, pos + i);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) {
> >> + unsigned int res, bit, val;
> >> +
> >> + res = (irq / 32) * 12;
> >> + bit = irq % 32;
> >> + dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,&val);
> >> + val |= 1<< bit;
> >> + dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val); }
> >> +
> >> static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos) {
> >> - int res, bit, irq, pos0, pos1, i;
> >> - u32 val;
> >> + int irq, pos0, pos1, i;
> >> struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
> >>
> >> if (!pp) {
> >> @@ -281,11 +301,10 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc
> >> *desc, int *pos)
> >> }
> >> set_bit(pos0 + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
> >> /*Enable corresponding interrupt in MSI interrupt controller
> >> */
> >> - res = ((pos0 + i) / 32) * 12;
> >> - bit = (pos0 + i) % 32;
> >> - dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
> >> 4,&val);
> >> - val |= 1<< bit;
> >> - dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
> >> 4, val);
> >> + if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq)
> >> + pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, pos0 + i);
> >> + else
> >> + dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(pp, pos0 + i);
> >> }
> >>
> >> *pos = pos0;
> >> @@ -353,7 +372,10 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_chip *chip,
> >> struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >> */
> >> desc->msi_attrib.multiple = msgvec;
> >>
> >> - msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> >> + if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
> >> + msg.address_lo = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp);
> >> + else
> >> + msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> >> msg.address_hi = 0x0;
> >> msg.data = pos;
> >> write_msi_msg(irq,&msg);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> >> designware.h
> >> index 8121901..387f69e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> >> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ struct pcie_host_ops {
> >> unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 val);
> >> int (*link_up)(struct pcie_port *pp);
> >> void (*host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp);
> >> + void (*msi_set_irq)(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
> >> + void (*msi_clear_irq)(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
> >> + u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp);
> >> };
> >>
> >> int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val);
> >
> > - Now MSI specific dw code can be shared b/w old Synopsys controller (ver< 3.70)
> > and newer controller that standardize the MSI settings inside design ware core itself.
> >
> > Jingoo,
> >
> > Pls let us know if you have any concern or comment over this.
> >
> > Acked-by: Mohit Kumar<mohit.kumar@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Regards
> > Mohit
> >
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >
> Mohit,
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jingoo, could you provide your response or Ack?

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

>
> Thanks
> --

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/