Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: report driver's successful {un}registration

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10 July 2014 19:37, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:38:23PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The problem with that is: CPUFreq may not be compiled in at all and we
>> wouldn't know the difference between success and absence.
>
> Of course you would: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/

Yeah, with a local board its easily detectable.

But I faced the issue when I had to see some test reports from
the automated stuff and wanted to see if cpufreq is up and running.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/