Re: [PATCH 03/19] mfd: tps80031: Fix 'missing break or fall-through comment' warning

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 July 2014 12:11:09 Lee Jones wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps80031.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps80031.c
> > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static bool rd_wr_reg_id1(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> >         case TPS80031_PREQ1_RES_ASS_A ... TPS80031_PREQ3_RES_ASS_C:
> >         case TPS80031_SMPS_OFFSET ... TPS80031_BATDEBOUNCING:
> >         case TPS80031_CFG_INPUT_PUPD1 ... TPS80031_CFG_SMPS_PD:
> > +               /* Fall through */
> >         case TPS80031_BACKUP_REG:
> >                 return true;
> >         default:
> 
> This one seems to make the code look worse: You are only adding the comment
> to one case, not all of them, and it was perfectly understandable
> before.
> 
> Further, there are a couple of other functions following this one that
> also don't have that comment.
> 
> It seems checkpatch missed all the other cases because they contain '...'
> lists, whereas the one above does not. I think it's better left alone.

You're right.  I forgot to remove this patch from the set.

Please see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/21/223

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/