Re: [PATCH RESEND] gpio: Add support for GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW to gpio_request_one functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The gpio include file and the gpio documentation declare and document
> GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW as one of the flags to be passed to gpio_request_one
> and related functions. However, the flag is not evaluated or used.
>
> This can cause problems in at least two areas: First, the same API can
> be used to auto-export pins to user space. The missing support for
> GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW results in unexpected behavior for such auto-exported
> pins. Second, the requested gpio pin can be convered for use by
> gpiod functions with gpio_to_desc(). While gpio API functions do not
> support GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW, gpiod functions do, which again results in
> unexpected behavior.
>
> Check the flag in gpio_request_one and set the gpio internal flag
> FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW if it is set to address those problems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patch applied after manually rebasing so it hits gpiolib-legacy.c.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/