Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 08/16] bpf: add hashtable type of BPF maps

From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed Jul 23 2014 - 15:57:30 EST


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(struct nlattr *attr[BPF_MAP_ATTR_MAX + 1])
>> +{
>> + struct bpf_htab *htab;
>> + int err, i;
>> +
>> + htab = kmalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER);
>
> I'd prefer kzalloc here.

in this case I agree. will change, since it's not in critical path and we
can waste few cycles zeroing memory.

>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + htab->buckets = kmalloc(htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct hlist_head),
>> + GFP_USER);
>
> I'd prefer kcalloc here, even though n_buckets can't currently trigger
> an integer overflow.

hmm, I would argue that kmalloc_array is a preferred way, but kcalloc ?
Few lines below the whole array is inited with INIT_HLIST_HEAD...

>> + for (i = 0; i < htab->n_buckets; i++)
>> + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&htab->buckets[i]);

>> + htab->slab_name = kasprintf(GFP_USER, "bpf_htab_%p", htab);
>
> This leaks a kernel heap memory pointer to userspace. If a unique name
> needed, I think map_id should be used instead.

it leaks, how? slabinfo is only available to root.
The same code exists in conntrack:
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1767
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/