Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: uvesafb.c: Cleaning up variable that is never used

[Rickard Strandqvist]

Hi

There is a lot in what you say.
In the beginning I send in a remark to the maintainer. It happened
absolutely nothing.

When I send out a patch that code is not used, then this code will be
reviewed. Which is the main purpose!

However, agree that this was perhaps an unusually clear solution.
I submit such a patch now.

Kind regards
Rickard Strandqvist


2014-07-22 11:27 GMT+02:00 Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>:
> On Tue 2014-07-22 11:16:58, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Sure, I agree. But as I thought that I would not change
>> currentfunctionality, I would increase the chance that the patches were
>> included. And it would of course also clarify this type of problem.
>
> I'm trying to say that getting rid of the variables without changing
> functionality might be wrong thing to do, for example in this case. It
> looks like error handing is missing by mistake, and you are removing
> traces saying that error handing is required here.
>
> Dunno. Perhaps don't push patches where solution is not obvious?
>
> Or push them but mark the place with fixme?
>
>                                                                         Pavel
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/