Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local

From: Jirka Hladky
Date: Thu Jul 31 2014 - 12:17:09 EST


On 07/31/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:39:40AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:24:05 +0800
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
commit a43455a1d572daf7b730fe12eb747d1e17411365 ("sched/numa: Ensure task_numa_migrate() checks the preferred node")

ebe06187bf2aec1 a43455a1d572daf7b730fe12e
--------------- -------------------------
94500 ~ 3% +115.6% 203711 ~ 6% ivb42/hackbench/50%-threads-pipe
67745 ~ 4% +64.1% 111174 ~ 5% lkp-snb01/hackbench/50%-threads-socket
162245 ~ 3% +94.1% 314885 ~ 6% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
Hi Aaron,

Jirka Hladky has reported a regression with that changeset as
well, and I have already spent some time debugging the issue.
Let me see if I can still find my SPECjbb2005 copy to see what that
does.
Jirka, what kind of setup were you seeing SPECjbb regressions?

I'm not seeing any on 2 sockets with a single SPECjbb instance, I'll go
check one instance per socket now.


Peter, I'm seeing regressions for

SINGLE SPECjbb instance for number of warehouses being the same as total number of cores in the box.

Example: 4 NUMA node box, each CPU has 6 cores => biggest regression is for 24 warehouses.

See the attached snapshot.

Jirka

Attachment: SPECjbb2005_-127.el7numafixes9.png
Description: PNG image