Re: [PATCH 4/4] Return the fan speed via sysfs

[Jean Delvare]

On Fri,  1 Aug 2014 14:00:50 +0000, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Return the fan speed via sysfs:
> /sys/devices/temperature/fan_level

Good idea. Even better would be if the driver would expose a standard
hwmon interface for the temperature values. Fan level could go in
attribute "pwm1" after proper scaling.

Please follow scripts/checkpatch.pl's advice to fix the coding style.

> This patch is copied from the Bryan Christianson's patch (see
> debian bug #741663)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/macintosh/therm_windtunnel.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/therm_windtunnel.c b/drivers/macintosh/therm_windtunnel.c
> index 0c4eb85..a2af7db 100644
> --- a/drivers/macintosh/therm_windtunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/macintosh/therm_windtunnel.c
> @@ -111,9 +111,15 @@ show_case_temperature( struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%d.%d\n", x.casetemp>>8, (x.casetemp & 255)*10/256 );
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t
> +show_fan_level( struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf )
> +{
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", 11 - x.fan_level );
> +}
> +
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(cpu_temperature, S_IRUGO, show_cpu_temperature, NULL );
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(case_temperature, S_IRUGO, show_case_temperature, NULL );
> -
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(fan_level, S_IRUGO, show_fan_level, NULL );
>  
>  
>  /************************************************************************/
> @@ -265,6 +271,7 @@ setup_hardware( void )
>  
>  	err = device_create_file( &x.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_cpu_temperature );
>  	err |= device_create_file( &x.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_case_temperature );
> +	err |= device_create_file( &x.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_fan_level );
>  	if (err)
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
>  			"Failed to create temperature attribute file(s).\n");

That's not your fault but please note that this construct is broken.
You can't "or" error codes together, the result if two or more calls
fail with different error codes is pretty random. Instead, each error
must be tested individually. I know checkpatch.pl will complain if you
do that but you can ignore it as is it the right thing to do in that
case.

> @@ -275,6 +282,7 @@ restore_regs( void )
>  {
>  	device_remove_file( &x.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_cpu_temperature );
>  	device_remove_file( &x.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_case_temperature );
> +	device_remove_file( &x.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_fan_level );
>  
>  	write_reg( x.fan, 0x01, x.r1, 1 );
>  	write_reg( x.fan, 0x20, x.r20, 1 );


-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/