Re: [PATCH] X86/CPU: Avoid 100ms sleep for cpu offline during S3

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Tue Aug 05 2014 - 04:41:46 EST


On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:59:02PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Some test result shows cpu offline consumes more than 100ms during S3.
> After some researchs, found native_cpu_die() would fall into 100ms
> sleep if cpu idle loop thread marked cpu state slower. What native_cpu_die()
> does is that poll cpu state and wait for 100ms if cpu state hasn't been marked
> to DEAD. The 100ms sleep doesn't make sense. To avoid such long sleep, this
> patch is to add struct completion to each cpu, wait for the completion
> in the native_cpu_die() and wakeup the completion when the cpu state is
> marked to DEAD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

...

> @@ -1339,18 +1342,16 @@ int native_cpu_disable(void)
> void native_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> /* We don't do anything here: idle task is faking death itself. */
> - unsigned int i;
> + wait_for_completion_timeout(&per_cpu(die_complete, cpu),
> + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));

One more thing peterz suggested. Just do:

wait_for_completion_timeout(&per_cpu(die_complete, cpu), HZ);

because HZ is the number of jiffies in a second. Which is what you want
here.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/