Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/17] 3.16.1-stable review

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sat Aug 09 2014 - 13:16:09 EST

On 08/09/2014 09:07 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There are two arm build failures in Linus' tree which are not seen
in -next.

Ugh. Did I screw up the semantic merge wrt the devm_phy_create()
argument changes despite having an example patch from Stephen? Or is
this something else due to something that just wasn't in -next?

Can you post the build failures?

Building arm:multi_v7_defconfig ... failed
Building arm:exynos_defconfig ... failed
Error log (same for both builds):

ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "disp_pd"

ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-arndale-octa.dtb] Error 2


$ git grep disp_pd
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi: samsung,power-domain = <&disp_pd>;

So, yes, disp_pd is not defined.

If I understand -next correctly, it includes a fixup which removes disp_pd
from the file. From the -next build log:

Applying: ARM: dts: exynos5420: remove disp_pd

Copying Stephen for additional input.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at