Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Sat Aug 09 2014 - 23:13:30 EST
On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > NAK. There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :)
> Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the
> lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem.
> Just being negative is not very constructive.
I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/