Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support
From: Brian Norris
Date: Wed Aug 13 2014 - 18:11:55 EST
Ping (Olof or Matt?)
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Brian Norris
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:30:40AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > From: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Add the UART definitions needed to support earlyprintk on brcmstb machines.
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>
>> I noticed that you sent this to the patch system. I asked Olof last
>> night whether he had anything in arm-soc touching Kconfig.debug, and
>> he does (a number of other platforms have updated it.) This means
>> that if I apply it to my tree, it may conflict, so I'm reluctant to
>> take it.
> OK... Matt told me that such patches go through you. So which is it?
> Should all Kconfig.debug patches go through the arm-soc route?
How should this get in? Should I rebase/resend through Matt and
arm-soc? Or can you pick this up as-is?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/