Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V1 1/3] ASoC: fsl: Kconfig: remove dependence of SND_IMX_SOC for SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA

From: Lars-Peter Clausen
Date: Tue Aug 19 2014 - 04:37:15 EST


On 08/19/2014 09:41 AM, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:52:46PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 08/18/2014 10:38 AM, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
Build kernel with SND_SOC_IMC_PCM_DMA=m && SND_IMX_SOC=n leads the following
error:

sound/built-in.o: In function `fsl_sai_probe':
fsl_sai.c:(.text+0x5f662): undefined reference to `imx_pcm_dma_init'
sound/built-in.o: In function `fsl_esai_probe':
fsl_esai.c:(.text+0x6044b): undefined reference to `imx_pcm_dma_init'

Most cpu driver in soc/fsl has use the function 'imx_pcm_dma_init' which is
defined in imx-pcm-dma.c, so need to select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA, but it depends
on SND_IMX_SOC, if SND_IMX_SOC=n, then SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA will not be
selected.
So remove the dependence of SND_IMX_SOC for SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Those if conditions where just added[1] by Arnd to avoid other build
failures. So just removing them again makes little sense.

As far as I can see imx_pcm_dma_init() should be stubbed out when
SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA is not selected. So what's going on here?

[1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ff40260f79dc0436604452bccd449bffd25ebafb

Lars-Peter Clausen & Arnd

The purpose of Arnd's patch is same with me, which is to resolve the build
error when SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA=m & SND_SOC_FSL_SSI/SAI/ESAI/SPDIF=y, the
error is "undefined reference to `imx_pcm_dma_init'".
But Arnd's patch didn't involve this situation that SND_IMX_SOC=n &
SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA=m.

Having SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA selected if SND_IMX_SOC is not selected makes no sense. I think the proper fix is to find out why it is selected and make sure that it is not selected when SND_IMX_SOC is not selected.


Currently I think out a solution for this issue is to change

select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA if SND_IMX_SOC != n

to

depends on SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA != m

How do you think about this?

No, that has the dependencies in reverse.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/