Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if_idle() to wake up the idle cpu

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed Aug 20 2014 - 23:48:19 EST


On 08/21/2014 04:12 AM, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
Hello Daniel,

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 9:54 AM
To: Liu, Chuansheng; luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liu, Changcheng;
Wang, Xiaoming; Chakravarty, Souvik K
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if_idle() to wake up the
idle cpu

On 08/18/2014 10:37 AM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
Implementing one new API wake_up_if_idle(), which is used to
wake up the idle CPU.

Is this patchset tested ? Did you check it solves the issue you were
facing ?
We have done the basic test, and found the cores can exit C0 quickly with this patchset.
Basically once the _TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set, then the poll_idle() can be broken.

Please correct me if something is wrong, thanks.

Actually, it was not clear for me if this patch was a proposal or not.

I will review it.

Thanks

-- Daniel

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 857ba40..3f89ac1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1024,6 +1024,7 @@ struct sched_domain_topology_level {
extern struct sched_domain_topology_level *sched_domain_topology;

extern void set_sched_topology(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl);
+extern void wake_up_if_idle(int cpu);

#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
# define SD_INIT_NAME(type) .name = #type
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 1211575..adf104f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1620,6 +1620,22 @@ static void ttwu_queue_remote(struct
task_struct *p, int cpu)
}
}

+void wake_up_if_idle(int cpu)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (set_nr_if_polling(rq->idle)) {
+ trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
+ } else {
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
+ if (rq->curr == rq->idle)
+ smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+ /* Else cpu is not in idle, do nothing here */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+ }
+}
+
bool cpus_share_cache(int this_cpu, int that_cpu)
{
return per_cpu(sd_llc_id, this_cpu) == per_cpu(sd_llc_id, that_cpu);



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM
SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/