Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm: use c99 initializers in structures

From: Josh Triplett
Date: Sat Aug 23 2014 - 11:17:07 EST


On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 01:20:28PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
>
> Use c99 initializers for structures.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @decl@
> identifier i1,fld;
> type T;
> field list[n] fs;
> @@
>
> struct i1 {
> fs
> T fld;
> ...};
>
> @bad@
> identifier decl.i1,i2;
> expression e;
> initializer list[decl.n] is;
> @@
>
> struct i1 i2 = { is,
> + .fld = e
> - e
> ,...};
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>

For this patch, I think it would make sense to drop
initializations of preferred/quirks/modes to 0, since a designated
initializer may skip fields to leave them initialized to 0.

With that change:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_vtac.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_vtac.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_vtac.c
> index 82a51d4..4576536 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_vtac.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_vtac.c
> @@ -56,8 +56,16 @@ struct sti_vtac_mode {
> u32 phyts_per_pixel;
> };
>
> -static const struct sti_vtac_mode vtac_mode_main = {0x2, 0x2, VTAC_5_PPP};
> -static const struct sti_vtac_mode vtac_mode_aux = {0x1, 0x0, VTAC_17_PPP};
> +static const struct sti_vtac_mode vtac_mode_main = {
> + .vid_in_width = 0x2,
> + .phyts_width = 0x2,
> + .phyts_per_pixel = VTAC_5_PPP
> +};
> +static const struct sti_vtac_mode vtac_mode_aux = {
> + .vid_in_width = 0x1,
> + .phyts_width = 0x0,
> + .phyts_per_pixel = VTAC_17_PPP
> +};
>
> /**
> * VTAC structure
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 1dbf3bc..a28c330 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2103,7 +2103,11 @@ static int
> add_inferred_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
> {
> struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
> - connector, edid, 0, 0, 0
> + .connector = connector,
> + .edid = edid,
> + .preferred = 0,
> + .quirks = 0,
> + .modes = 0
> };
>
> if (version_greater(edid, 1, 0))
> @@ -2169,7 +2173,11 @@ add_established_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
> ((edid->established_timings.mfg_rsvd & 0x80) << 9);
> int i, modes = 0;
> struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
> - connector, edid, 0, 0, 0
> + .connector = connector,
> + .edid = edid,
> + .preferred = 0,
> + .quirks = 0,
> + .modes = 0
> };
>
> for (i = 0; i <= EDID_EST_TIMINGS; i++) {
> @@ -2227,7 +2235,11 @@ add_standard_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
> {
> int i, modes = 0;
> struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
> - connector, edid, 0, 0, 0
> + .connector = connector,
> + .edid = edid,
> + .preferred = 0,
> + .quirks = 0,
> + .modes = 0
> };
>
> for (i = 0; i < EDID_STD_TIMINGS; i++) {
> @@ -2313,7 +2325,11 @@ static int
> add_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
> {
> struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
> - connector, edid, 0, 0, 0
> + .connector = connector,
> + .edid = edid,
> + .preferred = 0,
> + .quirks = 0,
> + .modes = 0
> };
>
> if (version_greater(edid, 1, 2))
> @@ -2357,11 +2373,11 @@ add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid,
> u32 quirks)
> {
> struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
> - connector,
> - edid,
> - 1,
> - quirks,
> - 0
> + .connector = connector,
> + .edid = edid,
> + .preferred = 1,
> + .quirks = quirks,
> + .modes = 0
> };
>
> if (closure.preferred && !version_greater(edid, 1, 3))
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/