Re: [PATCH 01/24] perf tools: Add a test for tracking with sched_switch

[Adrian Hunter]

On 29/08/2014 6:18 p.m., Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > > On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
> > > > not a requirement for this specific test.
> >
> > > I will keep that in mind.
> >
> > > > Applying!
> >
> > > Thank you!
> >
> > > AFAICT the other 20 patches still apply cleanly to your tree, so I am not
> > > going to send any more for now.
> >
> > Ok, I'll try to process more of those, the db interface probably, after
> > I try using it for some simple tests.
> >
> > About the PMU ones, that I would like to hear from other people dealing
> > with that area, like Jiri or even PeterZ, that IIRC discussed sysfs
> > interface aspects in the past, Jiri, Peter?
>
> I reviewed those, but I remember not getting an answer
> for my question about that
>    http://marc.info/?t=140533254600001&r=1&w=2

I guess I didn't understand what you meant.  I will reply to that thread.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/