Re: [PATCH] i2c:at91: Fix a race condition during signal handling in at91_do_twi_xfer.

[Ludovic Desroches]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:13:24PM +0200, Simon Lindgren wrote:
> There is a race condition in at91_do_twi_xfer when signals arrive.
> If a signal is recieved while waiting for a transfer to complete
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() will return -ERESTARTSYS.
> This is not handled correctly resulting in interrupts still being
> enabled and a transfer being in flight when we return.
> 
> Symptoms include a range of oopses and bus lockups. Oopses can happen
> when the transfer completes because the interrupt handler will corrupt
> the stack. If a new transfer is started before the interrupt fires
> the controller will start a new transfer in the middle of the old one,
> resulting in confused slaves and a locked bus.
> 
> To avoid this, use wait_for_completion_io_timeout instead so that we
> don't have to deal with gracefully shutting down the transfer and
> disabling the interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Lindgren <simon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for this fix.

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> index 79a6899..ec299ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> @@ -421,8 +421,8 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
> -							dev->adapter.timeout);
> +	ret = wait_for_completion_io_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
> +					     dev->adapter.timeout);
>  	if (ret == 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev->dev, "controller timed out\n");
>  		at91_init_twi_bus(dev);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/