Re: [PATCH 0/4] Tidy up of modules using seq_open()
From: Rob Jones
Date: Mon Sep 01 2014 - 08:47:24 EST
On 29/08/14 20:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:06:36 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Many modules use seq_open() when seq_open_private() or
__seq_open_private() would be more appropriate and result in
simpler, cleaner code.
This patch sequence changes those instances in IPC, MM and LIB.
Looks good to me.
I can't begin to imagine why we added the global, exported-to-modules
seq_open_private() without bothering to document it, so any time you
feel like adding the missing kerneldoc...
Already done, I waited for that to be accepted before I submitted this
patch :-)
And psize should have been size_t, ho hum.
I'll fix that while I'm in the vicinity.
--
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel:+44 161 236 5575
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/