[PATCH 05/13] genirq: Move MASK_ON_SUSPEND handling into suspend_device_irqs()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Sep 01 2014 - 10:13:11 EST


From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

There is no reason why we should delay the masking of interrupts whose
interrupt chip requests MASK_ON_SUSPEND to the point where we check
the wakeup interrupts. We can do it right at the point where we mark
the interrupt as suspended.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/irq/pm.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/irq/pm.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ linux/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ static void suspend_device_irq(struct ir

desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED;
__disable_irq(desc, irq);
+
+ /*
+ * Hardware which has no wakeup source configuration facility
+ * requires that the non wakeup interrupts are masked at the
+ * chip level. The chip implementation indicates that with
+ * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND.
+ */
+ if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
+ mask_irq(desc);
}

/**
@@ -176,19 +185,7 @@ int check_wakeup_irqs(void)
if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
if (desc->depth == 1 && desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING)
return -EBUSY;
- continue;
}
- /*
- * Check the non wakeup interrupts whether they need
- * to be masked before finally going into suspend
- * state. That's for hardware which has no wakeup
- * source configuration facility. The chip
- * implementation indicates that with
- * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND.
- */
- if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED &&
- irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
- mask_irq(desc);
}

return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/