Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix lock dropping in intel_tv_detect()

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:41:05AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:36:37PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:07:40PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > 
> >> > > When intel_tv_detect() fails to do load detection it would forget to
> >> > > drop the locks and clean up the acquire context. Fix it up.
> >> > > 
> >> > > This is a regression from:
> >> > >  commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5d48b3e0295f7cdaf6fc44
> >> > >  Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > >  Date:   Mon Aug 11 13:15:35 2014 +0300
> >> > > 
> >> > >     drm/i915: Fix locking for intel_enable_pipe_a()
> >> > > 
> >> > > v2: Make the code more readable (Chris)
> >> > > 
> >> > > Cc: Tibor Billes <tbilles@xxxxxxx>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > 
> >> > Hmm, if we use WARN_ON() you should init type.
> >> 
> >> type is always set in the branch that sets status=connected.
> >
> > Back to thinking about readability and making sure that the WARN_ON
> > never happens with just a glance. Otherwise, the WARN_ON would be better
> > as WARN_ON(unsigned)type >= last_tv_type); Or something. Anway, take
> > your pick and slap my r-b on it. :)
> 
> Ville?

I don't know anymore. Just kill the WARN_ON() if it makes things
confusing?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/