Re: [QUERY] Confusing usage of rq->nr_running in load balancing

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:51:45PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There are places in kernel/sched/fair.c in the load balancing part where
> rq->nr_running is used as against cfs_rq->nr_running. At least I could

> Did I miss something or is it true that the usage of rq->nr_running in
> the above places is incorrect?

Yeah, smells fishy. Probably hysterical accidents that haven't been
cleaned up yet. I do remember a few patches cleaning some of this up
recently. Clearly there's more to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/