Re: [PATCH v3] zram: add num_discards for discarded pages stat

From: Minchan Kim
Date: Wed Sep 03 2014 - 22:23:50 EST

Next message: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] ftracetest: Add XFAIL/XPASS and POSIX.3 std. result codes"
Previous message: Lai Jiangshan: "Re: workqueue: WARN at at kernel/workqueue.c:2176"
Next in thread: Sergey Senozhatsky: "Re: [PATCH v3] zram: add num_discards for discarded pages stat"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Sergey,

First of all, Sorry for late response.

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:15:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (08/26/14 14:08), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:01:18PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On (08/25/14 09:36), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > Hello Chao,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 04:21:01PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > Since we have supported handling discard request in this commit
> > > > > f4659d8e620d08bd1a84a8aec5d2f5294a242764 (zram: support REQ_DISCARD), zram got
> > > > > one more chance to free unused memory whenever received discard request. But
> > > > > without stating for discard request, there is no method for user to know whether
> > > > > discard request has been handled by zram or how many blocks were discarded by
> > > > > zram when user wants to know the effect of discard.
> > > >
> > > > My concern is that how much we are able to know the effect of discard
> > > > exactly with your patch.
> > > >
> > > > The issue I can think of is zram-swap discard.
> > > > Now, zram handles notification from VM to free duplicated copy between
> > > > VM-owned memory and zRAM-owned's one so discarding for zram-swap might
> > > > be pointless overhead but your stat indicates lots of free page discarded
> > > > without real freeing
> > >
> > > this is why I've moved stats accounting to the place where actual
> > > zs_free() happens. and, frankly, I still would like to see the number
> > > of zs_free() calls, rather than the number of slot free notifications
> > > and REQ_DISCARD (or separately), because they all end up calling
> > > zs_free(). iow, despite the call path, from the user point of view
> > > they are just zs_free() -- the number of pages that's been freed by
> > > the 3rd party and we had have to deal with that.
> >
> > My qeustion is that what user can do with the only real freeing count?
> > Could you give me a concret example?
>
> for !swap device case it's identicall to `num_discarded'.
> for swap device case, it's a bit more complicated (less convenient) if
> we actually can receive both slot free and delayed REQ_DISCARDs.
>
> > It's a just number of real freeing count so if you were admin, what
> > do you expect from that? That's what I'd like to see in changelog.
> >
> > >
> > > > so that user might think "We should keep enable
> > > > swap discard for zRAM because the stat indicates it's really good".
> > > >
> > > > In summary, wouldn't it better to have two?
> > > >
> > > > num_discards,
> > > > num_failed_discards?
> > >
> > > do we actully need this? the only value I can think of (perhaps I'm
> > > missing something) is that we can make sure that we need to support
> > > both slot free and REQ_DISCARDS, or we can leave only REQ_DISCARDS.
> > > is there anything else?
> >
> > The secnario I imagined with two stat is how REQ_DISCARDS is effective
> > from swap layer. Normally, slot free logic is called in advance
> > when the page is zapped or swap read happens to avoid duplicate copy,
> > so discard request from swap space would be just overhead without
> > any benefit so we might guide zram-swap user don't use "swap -d".
> > Otherwise, as failed_discard ratio is low, it means it would be
> > better to remove swap slot free logic because swap discard works well
> > without slot free hint.(Although I don't think)
>
> yes, so it looks like it is a developer's stat - to make some
> observations and to come up with some decisions. do we really
> want to put it into release?

Agree. I was too specific for my purpose and it couldn't be
a compelling reason to make it export for general purpose.

Actually, discard req sent by swap for getting free cluster
shouldn't be success(i,e num_discarded should be zero) because
zram_slot_free_notify will always free the duplicated copy
in advance so user don't have any gain with 'swapon -d'.

Now, I agree with you that we shouldn't add more stat without
compelling reason so it would be better to rename notify_free
with discarded and move it in zram_free_page like your patch.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/21/294

I will ask to Andrew to revert Chao's patch and pick your patch
after a few days unless Chao has another opinion.

>
>
> I'm not strongly against and we can proceed with Chao's patch.
>
> -ss
>
> > My point is I'm not saying you're wrong but adding a new stat is easy
> > and I need a compelling reason that how it can help users.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > >
> > > -ss
> > >
> > > > For it, we should modify zram_free_page has return value.
> > > > What do other guys think?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In this patch, we add num_discards to stat discarded pages, and export it to
> > > > > sysfs for users.
> > > > >
> > > > > * From v1
> > > > > * Update zram document to show num_discards in statistics list.
> > > > >
> > > > > * From v2
> > > > > * Update description of this patch with clear goal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram | 10 ++++++++++
> > > > > Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt | 1 +
> > > > > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 3 +++
> > > > > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 +
> > > > > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram
> > > > > index 70ec992..fa8936e 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram
> > > > > @@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ Description:
> > > > > The failed_writes file is read-only and specifies the number of
> > > > > failed writes happened on this device.
> > > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +What: /sys/block/zram<id>/num_discards
> > > > > +Date: August 2014
> > > > > +Contact: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > +Description:
> > > > > + The num_discards file is read-only and specifies the number of
> > > > > + physical blocks which are discarded by this device. These blocks
> > > > > + are included in discard request which is sended by filesystem as
> > > > > + the blocks are no longer used.
> > > > > +
> > > > > What: /sys/block/zram<id>/max_comp_streams
> > > > > Date: February 2014
> > > > > Contact: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> > > > > index 0595c3f..e50e18b 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> > > > > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ size of the disk when not in use so a huge zram is wasteful.
> > > > > num_writes
> > > > > failed_reads
> > > > > failed_writes
> > > > > + num_discards
> > > > > invalid_io
> > > > > notify_free
> > > > > zero_pages
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > > > index d00831c..904e7a5 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > > > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
> > > > > bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
> > > > > zram_free_page(zram, index);
> > > > > bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
> > > > > + atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_discards);
> > > > > index++;
> > > > > n -= PAGE_SIZE;
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -866,6 +867,7 @@ ZRAM_ATTR_RO(num_reads);
> > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(num_writes);
> > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(failed_reads);
> > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(failed_writes);
> > > > > +ZRAM_ATTR_RO(num_discards);
> > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(invalid_io);
> > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(notify_free);
> > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(zero_pages);
> > > > > @@ -879,6 +881,7 @@ static struct attribute *zram_disk_attrs[] = {
> > > > > &dev_attr_num_writes.attr,
> > > > > &dev_attr_failed_reads.attr,
> > > > > &dev_attr_failed_writes.attr,
> > > > > + &dev_attr_num_discards.attr,
> > > > > &dev_attr_invalid_io.attr,
> > > > > &dev_attr_notify_free.attr,
> > > > > &dev_attr_zero_pages.attr,
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > > > > index e0f725c..2994aaf 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > > > > @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct zram_stats {
> > > > > atomic64_t num_writes; /* --do-- */
> > > > > atomic64_t failed_reads; /* can happen when memory is too low */
> > > > > atomic64_t failed_writes; /* can happen when memory is too low */
> > > > > + atomic64_t num_discards; /* no. of discarded pages */
> > > > > atomic64_t invalid_io; /* non-page-aligned I/O requests */
> > > > > atomic64_t notify_free; /* no. of swap slot free notifications */
> > > > > atomic64_t zero_pages; /* no. of zero filled pages */
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.0.1.474.g72c7794
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > > > > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> > > > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > > > > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Minchan Kim
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Minchan Kim
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] ftracetest: Add XFAIL/XPASS and POSIX.3 std. result codes"
Previous message: Lai Jiangshan: "Re: workqueue: WARN at at kernel/workqueue.c:2176"
Next in thread: Sergey Senozhatsky: "Re: [PATCH v3] zram: add num_discards for discarded pages stat"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]