Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:33:40PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Why not something like the below; then it becomes a compile time matter.
> 
> Problem is that some archs only have that information at runtime.
> See x86 for example which tests cpu_has_apic.

So the other archs can still benefit, no? Also, on x86 cpu features can
be used with asm_goto/jump_labels, your approach wrecks that too by
copying it into some static variable, see static_cpu_has().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/