On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 11:00, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
And the thing is; we're all very busy so we tend to take the 'easy'
way out for things like this; but wholesale switching all my machines
is indeed painful, and I'm not liking.
Right, I think kernel people will gladly jump on a sane solution devoid
of that kids-jerking-off-on-linux-desktop-just-for-the-fun-of-it
situation if someone would present them with one. So, if someone would
come up and do a sane init design without the jerking off, kernel people
would jump on that in a heartbeat. Someone might even start getting
patches from them too. ^^Hint^^ ^^hint^^.
:-)
Hmm, a sane and maintainable solution would use C++ with which people don't
have to manually build lists or hashes for every structure like in the
kernel (generic programming done right). So you won't find much kernel
developers there. ;)
Seriously Dude?
Have you tried it? I was using c++ before during and after the stl was
standardised
and the memories of the resulting induced self hair pulling still
gives me the shivers.
Try writing a real time kernel with full c++ support. You have to
provide the entire c++
runtime in the kernel!
I still do a little c++ programming when i am forced to but its only
in small pieces.
Ill go crazy otherwise.