Re: [PATCH v3] zram: add num_discards for discarded pages stat

From: Sergey Senozhatsky
Date: Fri Sep 05 2014 - 07:32:12 EST

Next message: Paul Bolle: "Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X"
Previous message: Jason Cooper: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1"
In reply to: Minchan Kim: "Re: [PATCH v3] zram: add num_discards for discarded pages stat"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

On (09/05/14 09:35), Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:43:31AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On (09/04/14 11:25), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Hello Sergey,
> > >
> > > First of all, Sorry for late response.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:15:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > On (08/26/14 14:08), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:01:18PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On (08/25/14 09:36), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello Chao,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 04:21:01PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > Since we have supported handling discard request in this commit
> > > > > > > > f4659d8e620d08bd1a84a8aec5d2f5294a242764 (zram: support REQ_DISCARD), zram got
> > > > > > > > one more chance to free unused memory whenever received discard request. But
> > > > > > > > without stating for discard request, there is no method for user to know whether
> > > > > > > > discard request has been handled by zram or how many blocks were discarded by
> > > > > > > > zram when user wants to know the effect of discard.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My concern is that how much we are able to know the effect of discard
> > > > > > > exactly with your patch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The issue I can think of is zram-swap discard.
> > > > > > > Now, zram handles notification from VM to free duplicated copy between
> > > > > > > VM-owned memory and zRAM-owned's one so discarding for zram-swap might
> > > > > > > be pointless overhead but your stat indicates lots of free page discarded
> > > > > > > without real freeing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > this is why I've moved stats accounting to the place where actual
> > > > > > zs_free() happens. and, frankly, I still would like to see the number
> > > > > > of zs_free() calls, rather than the number of slot free notifications
> > > > > > and REQ_DISCARD (or separately), because they all end up calling
> > > > > > zs_free(). iow, despite the call path, from the user point of view
> > > > > > they are just zs_free() -- the number of pages that's been freed by
> > > > > > the 3rd party and we had have to deal with that.
> > > > >
> > > > > My qeustion is that what user can do with the only real freeing count?
> > > > > Could you give me a concret example?
> > > >
> > > > for !swap device case it's identicall to `num_discarded'.
> > > > for swap device case, it's a bit more complicated (less convenient) if
> > > > we actually can receive both slot free and delayed REQ_DISCARDs.
> > > >
> > > > > It's a just number of real freeing count so if you were admin, what
> > > > > do you expect from that? That's what I'd like to see in changelog.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > so that user might think "We should keep enable
> > > > > > > swap discard for zRAM because the stat indicates it's really good".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In summary, wouldn't it better to have two?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > num_discards,
> > > > > > > num_failed_discards?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > do we actully need this? the only value I can think of (perhaps I'm
> > > > > > missing something) is that we can make sure that we need to support
> > > > > > both slot free and REQ_DISCARDS, or we can leave only REQ_DISCARDS.
> > > > > > is there anything else?
> > > > >
> > > > > The secnario I imagined with two stat is how REQ_DISCARDS is effective
> > > > > from swap layer. Normally, slot free logic is called in advance
> > > > > when the page is zapped or swap read happens to avoid duplicate copy,
> > > > > so discard request from swap space would be just overhead without
> > > > > any benefit so we might guide zram-swap user don't use "swap -d".
> > > > > Otherwise, as failed_discard ratio is low, it means it would be
> > > > > better to remove swap slot free logic because swap discard works well
> > > > > without slot free hint.(Although I don't think)
> > > >
> > > > yes, so it looks like it is a developer's stat - to make some
> > > > observations and to come up with some decisions. do we really
> > > > want to put it into release?
> > >
> > > Agree. I was too specific for my purpose and it couldn't be
> > > a compelling reason to make it export for general purpose.
> > >
> > > Actually, discard req sent by swap for getting free cluster
> > > shouldn't be success(i,e num_discarded should be zero) because
> > > zram_slot_free_notify will always free the duplicated copy
> > > in advance so user don't have any gain with 'swapon -d'.
> > >
> > > Now, I agree with you that we shouldn't add more stat without
> > > compelling reason so it would be better to rename notify_free
> > > with discarded and move it in zram_free_page like your patch.
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/21/294
> > >
> > > I will ask to Andrew to revert Chao's patch and pick your patch
> > > after a few days unless Chao has another opinion.
> > >
> >
> > no problem.
> >
> > I, probably, was not clear enough. one of my objections was that
> > it is really easy to add a new stat file, and surprisingly hard to
> > remove it later, even a temporary one. because it's almost impossible
> > to beat the "someone might use it" argument.
>
> Almost true but it's not the case for sysfs.
> Documentation/sysfs-rulies.txt says
>
> "The kernel-exported sysfs exports internal kernel implementation details
> and depends on internal kernel structures and layout. It is agreed upon
> by the kernel developers that the Linux kernel does not provide a stable
> internal API. Therefore, there are aspects of the sysfs interface that
> may not be stable across kernel releases."
>
> So, we could decide a schedule when we removes and warn to user
> if they try to see that. If any serious issue doesn't appear until
> the deadline, we would remove it then.
>
> You could read Documentation/ABI/README.

oh, didn't know that. thanks!

>
> > just a side note, my whole impresion is that some of the stats, that we
> > export, belongs to /proc/diskstats, /sys/block/zramX/stat and frieds.
> > I didn't check but I think that some handy tools like iostat/etc are
> > using these files. though I have no idea how often (if ever) people
> > want to track (or at least see) zram in iostat or similar tools.
>
> Yeb, I knew it and wanted to clean it up in my spare time but
> patches are welcome!
>
> >
> >
> >
> > please let me know if I have to resend the patch.
>
> It would be great if you send.
> Could you resend a patch with aking to Andrew for dropping
> Chao's patch?

ok.

-ss

> Thanks!
>
> >
> > -ss
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm not strongly against and we can proceed with Chao's patch.
> > > >
> > > > -ss
> > > >
> > > > > My point is I'm not saying you're wrong but adding a new stat is easy
> > > > > and I need a compelling reason that how it can help users.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -ss
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For it, we should modify zram_free_page has return value.
> > > > > > > What do other guys think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In this patch, we add num_discards to stat discarded pages, and export it to
> > > > > > > > sysfs for users.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * From v1
> > > > > > > > * Update zram document to show num_discards in statistics list.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * From v2
> > > > > > > > * Update description of this patch with clear goal.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram | 10 ++++++++++
> > > > > > > > Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt | 1 +
> > > > > > > > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 3 +++
> > > > > > > > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 +
> > > > > > > > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram
> > > > > > > > index 70ec992..fa8936e 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram
> > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram
> > > > > > > > @@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ Description:
> > > > > > > > The failed_writes file is read-only and specifies the number of
> > > > > > > > failed writes happened on this device.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +What: /sys/block/zram<id>/num_discards
> > > > > > > > +Date: August 2014
> > > > > > > > +Contact: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > +Description:
> > > > > > > > + The num_discards file is read-only and specifies the number of
> > > > > > > > + physical blocks which are discarded by this device. These blocks
> > > > > > > > + are included in discard request which is sended by filesystem as
> > > > > > > > + the blocks are no longer used.
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > What: /sys/block/zram<id>/max_comp_streams
> > > > > > > > Date: February 2014
> > > > > > > > Contact: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> > > > > > > > index 0595c3f..e50e18b 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt
> > > > > > > > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ size of the disk when not in use so a huge zram is wasteful.
> > > > > > > > num_writes
> > > > > > > > failed_reads
> > > > > > > > failed_writes
> > > > > > > > + num_discards
> > > > > > > > invalid_io
> > > > > > > > notify_free
> > > > > > > > zero_pages
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > > > > > > index d00831c..904e7a5 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
> > > > > > > > bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
> > > > > > > > zram_free_page(zram, index);
> > > > > > > > bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
> > > > > > > > + atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_discards);
> > > > > > > > index++;
> > > > > > > > n -= PAGE_SIZE;
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > @@ -866,6 +867,7 @@ ZRAM_ATTR_RO(num_reads);
> > > > > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(num_writes);
> > > > > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(failed_reads);
> > > > > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(failed_writes);
> > > > > > > > +ZRAM_ATTR_RO(num_discards);
> > > > > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(invalid_io);
> > > > > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(notify_free);
> > > > > > > > ZRAM_ATTR_RO(zero_pages);
> > > > > > > > @@ -879,6 +881,7 @@ static struct attribute *zram_disk_attrs[] = {
> > > > > > > > &dev_attr_num_writes.attr,
> > > > > > > > &dev_attr_failed_reads.attr,
> > > > > > > > &dev_attr_failed_writes.attr,
> > > > > > > > + &dev_attr_num_discards.attr,
> > > > > > > > &dev_attr_invalid_io.attr,
> > > > > > > > &dev_attr_notify_free.attr,
> > > > > > > > &dev_attr_zero_pages.attr,
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > > > > > > > index e0f725c..2994aaf 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct zram_stats {
> > > > > > > > atomic64_t num_writes; /* --do-- */
> > > > > > > > atomic64_t failed_reads; /* can happen when memory is too low */
> > > > > > > > atomic64_t failed_writes; /* can happen when memory is too low */
> > > > > > > > + atomic64_t num_discards; /* no. of discarded pages */
> > > > > > > > atomic64_t invalid_io; /* non-page-aligned I/O requests */
> > > > > > > > atomic64_t notify_free; /* no. of swap slot free notifications */
> > > > > > > > atomic64_t zero_pages; /* no. of zero filled pages */
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > 2.0.1.474.g72c7794
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > > > > > > > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> > > > > > > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > > > > > > > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > Minchan Kim
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > > > > > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> > > > > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > > > > > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > Minchan Kim
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > > > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> > > > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > > > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Minchan Kim
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul Bolle: "Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X"
Previous message: Jason Cooper: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1"
In reply to: Minchan Kim: "Re: [PATCH v3] zram: add num_discards for discarded pages stat"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]