Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17
From: Peter Kieser
Date: Fri Sep 05 2014 - 19:18:08 EST
On 2014-09-05 2:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
Just because a maintainer/developer doesn't want to do anything for the
stable kernel releases does_NOT_ mean the code is
"unstable/expreimental" at all.
These are more bcache-ate-my-data unstable bugs. It's standard practice
to backport fixes that cause instability/data corruption to a 'stable'
release (otherwise, why would it be named 'stable')?
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature