Re: [PATCH 1/4] kaslr: check user's config too when handle relocations

[Baoquan He]

On 09/10/14 at 11:04am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53:34PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 09/10/14 at 10:30am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > In case of kdump we will have to pass nokaslr, as we don't want kernel
> > > to move as it could stomp over other things we have loaded.
> > 
> > For kdump and kexec nokaslr is unnecessary. As you know we always
> > call add_buffer with buf_end as 1, this will cause kernel loaded at the
> > top of available memory. E.g on my pc with 16G memory, kexec kernel will
> > be put nearby 16G, so no random location choosing happen as I said in
> > above. For kdump, if reserved memory is at 500M~700M, then kernel will
> > be put nearby 700M, the random location choosing also never happen.
> > 
> > In fact, for some cases I need change kexec-tools user app code, to make
> > kernel be put from down to top.
> 
> I think we can't rely on where exactly in memory kexec-tools places the
> kernel. For kdump case we will have to pass nokaslr to make sure that
> kaslr does not move kernel.

In fact with this fix, it still works though kdump kernel is relocated
if kdump kernel is put in a low addr of reserved memory. But I am fine
with it that adding nokaslr to make it safer.

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/