Re: [RFC][PATCH] signal: replace !likely with unlikely!

From: Li RongQing
Date: Fri Sep 12 2014 - 22:48:32 EST


I did not test, how to test it?

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:48:16AM +0800, roy.qing.li@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> !likely() is hard to be understood, and I do not know if compiler can
>> optimise this condition, but unlikely(!()) is clear
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
>> index 8f0876f..6156cfa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, int group)
>> BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC));
>>
>> ret = -1;
>> - if (!likely(lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
>> + if (unlikely(!lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
>
> I wonder if you tested this code. Seems to be unlikely (punt not intended).
>
> Guenter
>
>> goto ret;
>>
>> ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/