Re: [PATCH 1/7] selftests: add header file for test exit code defines

[Shuah Khan]

On 09/16/2014 11:40 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> I think we will want a framework in the tree, but it can be very
> minimal.  But I also think that using exit(2) for this is wrong.  Why
> not:
> 
> enum ktest_result {
>   KTEST_PASS,
>   ...,
> };
> 
> void ktest_exit(enum ktest_result result);
> 
> With the possibility of further extensions for more than one test (and
> associated result) per execution of the test binary.
> 

Nothing wrong with the approach. It is one of the options I considered
and decided against it primarily because tests need more changes than
the ones needed for return codes. However, maybe it is worth while to
do so. I will play with this and see how extensive the changes are.

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/