[PATCH v3] sched: Fix end_of_stack() and location of stack canary for architectures using CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP

From: Chuck Ebbert
Date: Sat Sep 20 2014 - 11:18:01 EST


Aaron Tomlin recently posted patches [1] to enable checking the stack
canary on every task switch. Looking at the canary code, I realized
that every arch (except ia64, which adds some space for register spill
above the stack) shares a definition of end_of_stack() that makes it
the first long after the threadinfo.

For stacks that grow down, this low address is correct because the stack starts
at the end of the thread area and grows toward lower addresses. However, for
stacks that grow up, toward higher addresses, this is wrong. (The stack actually
grows away from the canary.) On these archs end_of_stack() should return the
address of the last long, at the highest possible address for the stack.

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/293

Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> [metag]
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

V3: Fix line length, add comment.

diff a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2609,9 +2609,23 @@ static inline void setup_thread_stack(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct
task_thread_info(p)->task = p;
}

+/*
+ * Return the address of the last usable long on the stack.
+ *
+ * When the stack grows down, this is just above the thread
+ * info struct. Going any lower will corrupt the threadinfo.
+ *
+ * When the stack grows up, this is the highest address.
+ * Beyond that position, we corrupt data on the next page.
+ */
static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
+ return (unsigned long *)
+ ((unsigned long)task_thread_info(p) + THREAD_SIZE) - 1;
+#else
return (unsigned long *)(task_thread_info(p) + 1);
+#endif
}

#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/