Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] mtd: ubi: Read disturb infrastructure

From: Jeremiah Mahler
Date: Sun Sep 28 2014 - 14:14:02 EST


Tanya,

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 09:37:00AM +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> The need for performing read disturb is determined according to new
> statistics collected per eraseblock:
> - read counter: incremented at each read operation
> reset at each erase
> - last erase time stamp: updated at each erase
>
> This patch adds the infrastructure for the above statistics
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
...
> @@ -385,6 +402,38 @@ static ssize_t dev_attribute_show(struct device *dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t dev_attribute_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int value;
> + struct ubi_device *ubi;
> +
> + ubi = container_of(dev, struct ubi_device, dev);
> + ubi = ubi_get_device(ubi->ubi_num);
> + if (!ubi)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (kstrtos32(buf, 10, &value))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /* Consider triggering full scan if threshods change */
> + else if (attr == &dev_dt_threshold) {
> + if (value < UBI_MAX_DT_THRESHOLD)
> + ubi->dt_threshold = value;
> + else
> + pr_err("Max supported threshold value is %d",
> + UBI_MAX_DT_THRESHOLD);
> + } else if (attr == &dev_rd_threshold) {
> + if (value < UBI_MAX_READCOUNTER)
> + ubi->rd_threshold = value;
> + else
> + pr_err("Max supported threshold value is %d",
> + UBI_MAX_READCOUNTER);
> + }
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
...

One small style nit. As per Documentation/CodingStyle [line 169] if
one branch in a conditional uses braces then all branches should use
braces.

--
Jeremiah Mahler
jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx
http://github.com/jmahler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/